Cases 1 - 8 of 8
World War II Theatre, Inc v. Desimone Consulting Engineering Group, LLC, et al
as 2:2019cv11187
Defendant:
Evanston Insurance Company, Desimone Consulting Engineering Group, LLC, Markel Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
World War II Theatre, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evanston Insurance Company v. AXYZ Automation Inc
as 2:2016cv03680
Defendant:
AXYZ Automation Inc
Plaintiff:
Evanston Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evanston Insurance Company v. William Kramer & Associates, LLC
as 8:2016cv02324
Plaintiff:
Evanston Insurance Company
Defendant:
William Kramer & Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evanston Insurance Company v. Environmental Integrity Company, LLC et al
as 4:2014cv00174
Plaintiff:
Evanston Insurance Company
Defendant:
Environmental Integrity Company, LLC and Charles Bailey Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evanston Insurance Company v. Titeflex Corporation
as 1:2014cv00919
Plaintiff:
Evanston Insurance Company
Defendant:
Titeflex Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evanston Insurance Company v. Hughes Pfiffner Gorski Seedorf
as 08-35340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
HUGHES PFIFFNER GORSKI SEEDORF & ODSEN, LLC
Evanston Insurance Company v. Hughes, Bauman, Pffiffner, Gorski & Seedorf, LLC
as 3:2007cv00080
Plaintiff:
Evanston Insurance Company
Defendant:
Hughes, Bauman, Pffiffner, Gorski & Seedorf, LLC and Hughes, Bauman, Pffiffner, Gorski & Seedorf, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY v. HUGHES BAUMAN PFIFFNER GORSKI & SEEDORF, LLC
as 3:2007cv00296
Plaintiff:
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
HUGHES BAUMAN PFIFFNER GORSKI & SEEDORF, LLC and HUGHES BAUMAN PFIFFNER GORSKI & SEEDORF, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
