Cases 1 - 10 of 165
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Muqit v. ofc Rivera et al
as 0:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
Yahya Muqit
Defendant:
ofc Rivera, Sgt Salazor, Sgt. Kimbrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Dean v. Lim et al
as 1:2024cv00020
Defendant:
Ofc./Sgt. Readon, FSS Lim, Sgt. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
William Elam, III v. Stephen Early
as 23-2246
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILLIAM NILE ELAM, III
Defendant / Appellant:
STEPHEN TIMOTHY EARLY, MICHAEL S. EARLY and SUZANNE J. EARLY
Doe v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv05745
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Charles Williams, Susan Duffy, Curtis Early and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Anthony Martin v. T. Lasley
as 23-7081
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY FRED MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
T. LASLEY, Lieutenant, B. ROGERS, Sergeant, CAPTAIN ROBERTSON and others
Monroe v. Bennett et al
as 6:2023cv05257
Plaintiff:
Joshua Monroe
Defendant:
Jonathan Bennett, Beverly James, Mr Steven McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Martin v. Lasley et al
as 4:2023cv04490
Plaintiff:
Anthony Fred Martin
Defendant:
Lieutenant T. Lasley, Sergeant G. Rogers, Captain Roberson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
