Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Dieckhaus v. East Carolina University et al
as 4:2020cv00069
Plaintiff:
Deena Dieckhaus
Defendant:
Board of Governors of the University of North Carolina and East Carolina University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
John Doe v. East Carolina University
as 19-1217
Defendant / Appellee:
VIRGINIA HARDY, individually and as agent for East Carolina University, HEIDI BONNER, individually and as agent for East Carolina University, JOHN BELLFLOWER, JR., individually and as agent for East Carolina University and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00137
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00186
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SACKOS v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2014cv01710
Defendant:
ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY, ALABAMA A&M UNIVERSITY, ALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY and others
Plaintiff:
SAMANTHA SACKOS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
East Carolina University v. Cisco Systems, Inc., et al
as 4:2013cv00123
Plaintiff:
East Carolina University
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc. and Cisco Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
East Carolina University v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
as 4:2013cv00003
Plaintiff:
East Carolina University
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
