Cases 21 - 30 of 306
Wilson v. Crow et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00353
Defendant:
John Pryor, John Crow, Easterling Medical Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel MacArthur Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paloma v. New York City Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv02133
Defendant:
New York City Department of Corrections and Correction Officer Easterling
Plaintiff:
Miriahm T. Paloma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Covington v. Easterling
as 3:2019cv01273
Plaintiff:
Charles Jerome Covington
Defendant:
Todd Easterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Jackson et al
as 4:2019cv03191
Defendant:
Judge Maria T Jackson, Assistant DA of District 339th, Danny K. Easterling and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Joshua Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Franklin Parish Detention Center et al
as 3:2019cv00864
Defendant:
Sonya Smith, Chad Lee, Kevin Cobb and others
Plaintiff:
Bryant K Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. LeBlanc et al
as 1:2019cv00600
Defendant:
William Easterling, Tyson Bonnette, W S McCain and others
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2019cv00194
Defendant:
William Easterling, James M. LeBlanc, Tyson Bonnette and others
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Easterling et al
as 3:2019cv00308
Defendant:
Randy Sewell, Lt Bordelon, Chad Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Moses Mack Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Easterling et al
as 4:2018cv03016
Respondent:
Danny K. Easterling and Lacy Johnson
Petitioner:
Joseph Junio Johnson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easterling v. Mississippi Correctional Services et al
as 3:2018cv00490
Defendant:
Sheriff Brian Bailey, Rankin County Jail Medical Personel (Medical staff), Barry Vaughn and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Art Tyrone Easterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
