Cases 41 - 50 of 841
Nathan Railey v. Ebbert, et al
as 19-3889
Defendant / Appellee:
SIS OFFICER BUEBENDORF, THARP, Counselor of B- Block Housing Unit of Lewisburg USP, DAVID EBBERT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN A. RAILEY
Kenneth Reid, et al v. Warden David J. Ebbert, et al
as 20-1195
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN DAVID J. EBBERT and SEBAL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE, ERIC HOUSTON, BRANDON JAQUAY HOLMES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH R. REID
Chambers v. ("The B.O.P.") United States Penitentiary Lewisburg
as 1:2019cv02067
Petitioner:
Demarcus L. Chambers
Respondent:
David J Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Webster v. Jones et al
as 3:2019cv00385
Defendant:
Terry Goodwin Jones, Judy Bearce, Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Leon Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Ebbert
as 2:2019cv02819
Petitioner:
Demarcus L. Chambers
Respondent:
("The B.O.P.") United States Penitentiary Lewisburg and Warden David J Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Webster v. Ebbert
as 3:2019cv00272
Plaintiff:
Gary Leon Webster
Defendant:
Jay Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roscoe Chambers v. Ebbert, et al
as 19-3135
Defendant / Appellee:
J. MOYER, WARDEN DAVID EBBERT, CERNEY, DHO Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Roscoe Chambers v. Ebbert, et al
as 19-3394
Defendant / Appellee:
J. MOYER, WARDEN DAVID EBBERT, CERNEY, DHO Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Roscoe Chambers v. Ebbert, et al
as 19-3395
Defendant / Appellee:
C.O. GONSAR, A. SCOTT, DAVID EBBERT, Warden and others
Defendant:
COUNSELOR DILTZ, COUNSELOR GONSAR, COUNSELOR A. SCOTT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Frederick Graham v. Ian Connors, et al
as 19-2752
Defendant / Appellee:
IAN CONNORS, J. E. KRUEGER, Warden, J. SHERMAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK GRAHAM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
