Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Judka v. Emmel et al
as 1:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Judka
Defendant:
Dennis Emmel, John Derek Macomber, Maxine Moul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCHAFFER'S AUTOMOTIVE, LLC et al v. CAERNARVON TOWNSHIP et al
as 5:2022cv03353
Plaintiff:
SCHAFFER'S AUTOMOTIVE, LLC, WILLIAM SCHAFFER, RONALD SCHAFFER and others
Defendant:
CAERNARVON TOWNSHIP, SANDRA STYER, PAUL WHITEMAN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wolshlager v. Cotter et al
as 1:2021cv00812
Plaintiff:
Doug Arthur Wolshlager
Defendant:
Art Cotter, Carmal R. Harlow, James Hall-Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
EBERLY v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
as 2:2021cv00678
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE EBERLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01462
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Wolshlager v. Gast et al
as 1:2019cv00293
Defendant:
Peter Drent, Kevin Allread, James Hall-Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Arthur Wolshlager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wolshlager v. Eberly et al
as 1:2017cv00177
Plaintiff:
Doug Arthur Wolshlager
Defendant:
Ben Eberly and S. Yect
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv03983
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Wolshlayer v. Gust et al
as 1:2016cv00553
Plaintiff:
Doug Wolshlayer
Defendant:
Jeffrey R. Gust, S. Yech and Ben Eberly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Croghan v. Brunning et al
as 4:2014cv03238
Defendant:
Shannon Anderson, W. Mark Ashford, John Brunning and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Dale Croghan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
