Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Knode v. Fredrikson et al
as 4:2023cv04171
Plaintiff:
Andrew Dwight Knode
Defendant:
Tracy Fredrikson, Doug Clark, Mark Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Wasko et al
as 4:2022cv04054
Plaintiff:
James Elmer Shaw
Defendant:
Kelly Wasko, Dan Sullivan, Brent Fluke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harcey v. South Dakota Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 4:2021cv04071
Defendant:
Myron Rau, Kenneth Albers, Chuck Schroyer and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Harcey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nygaard v. Taylor et al
as 3:2019cv03016
Respondent:
Todd Waldo, Ed Ducheneaux, Brenda Claymore and others
Petitioner:
Aarin Nygaard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jakubowski v. Beuckens
as 5:2018cv05055
Defendant:
Christle Beuckens
Plaintiff:
Ed Jakubowski, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kling v. Louie et al
as 4:2018cv04027
Plaintiff:
Kary Gene Kling
Defendant:
Ed Louie, Robert Dooley, Jeremy Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkinson et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv01083
Plaintiff:
Erin Wilkinson , Ed Wilkinson , Wilkinson Ranch, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC. and Syngenta Seeds, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnston v. Dooley et al
as 4:2015cv04126
Plaintiff:
David H. Johnston
Defendant:
Robert Dooley, Dennis Kaemingk, Marty Jackley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sund v. Young et al
as 5:2014cv05070
Petitioner:
Dennis Ray Sund
Respondent:
Darin Young, Ed Ligtenberg and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Pennington Co. Clerk of Courts et al
as 5:2014cv05058
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. Jones
Defendant:
Pennington Co. Clerk of Courts, Doug Weber, Darin Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
