Cases 1 - 10 of 10
North v. Carroll et al
as 2:2018cv01037
Plaintiff:
Abraham North
Defendant:
Ed Carroll, Mr Razar, Mr Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Carrol
as 0:2017cv01971
Petitioner:
Romell Holmes
Respondent:
Ed Carrol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dustin Williamson v. Brian Sterling
as 17-6922
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DUSTIN ROBERT WILLIAMSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN STERLING, DELORIS CHARLTON, ED CARROLL and others
Defendant:
JANE OR JOHN DOE, at Solicitors office in Barnwell, South Carolina, in individual capacity
Payne v. Carrol et al
as 2:2017cv01296
Petitioner:
Demontary Payne
Respondent:
Ed Carrol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dustin Williamson v. Brian Sterling
as 17-6595
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DUSTIN ROBERT WILLIAMSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN P. STERLING, DELORIS CHARLTON, ED CARROLL and others
Defendant:
JANE OR JOHN DOE, at Solicitors office in Barnwell, South Caroilina, in individual capacity
Carthens et al v. Barnwell Co Detention Ctr et al
as 2:2016cv00258
Plaintiff:
Norman Carthens
Defendant:
Barnwell Co Detention Ctr, Deloris B Charlton, Ed Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williamson v. Sterling et al
as 0:2015cv04755
Plaintiff:
Dustin Robert Williamson
Defendant:
Brian Sterling, Deloris Charlton, Ed Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. Carroll et al
as 1:2015cv04228
Plaintiff:
Derrick Joseph Miles
Defendant:
Ed Carroll, K S Peterson, J Strom Thurmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Everett Jackson v. Cory Booker, et al
as 11-3400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVERETT ADAM JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CORY A. BOOKER, LISA DURDEN, MARC BENJAMIN and others
Debtor - Appellee:
SUNDANCE CHANNEL
JACKSON v. BOOKER et al
as 2:2010cv05371
Plaintiff:
EVERETT ADAM JACKSON
Defendant:
CORY A. BOOKER, LISA DURDEN, MARC BENJAMIN and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
