Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Lundy et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 3:2020cv05282
Plaintiff:
Stacy McDaniel, Mose Edward Green, Jr., Vernita M. Simpson and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Green v. Mark Gober, et al
as 15-1359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Edward Green, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Mark Gober, Drew County Sheriff, Susan Potts, Administrator of Drew County Detention Facility, Paul D. Selby, Attorney, Monticello Regional OCSE and others
James Green, Jr. v. Ray Hobb
as 14-3375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Edward Green, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Green v. Hobbs
as 5:2014cv00009
Plaintiff:
James Edward Green, Jr
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
v. Green
as 3:2013cv04032
Defendant:
Thomas Edward Green, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Non-Motor Vehicle
Unniebe Solomon et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv05049
Plaintiff:
Allyson Allen, Ethel Caroleen Allen, Earmedine Armfield and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca PLC, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Does and others
Green v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2012cv00068
Plaintiff:
James Edward Green, Jr
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs and S Wilson-Cotton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Potts et al
as 5:2008cv00071
Plaintiff:
James Edward Green, Jr
Defendant:
Susan Potts and Debbie Rausch
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Green v. Monticello Arkansas, City of et al
as 5:2008cv00020
Plaintiff:
James Edward Green, Jr
Defendant:
Monticello Arkansas, City of, Robert Rosegrant, Steven Stain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Monticello, City of et al
as 5:2007cv00215
Plaintiff:
James Edward Green, Jr
Defendant:
Monticello, City of, Robert Rosegrant, Steven Stain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
