Cases 31 - 40 of 49
McCormack v. Stults et al
as 3:2011cv01685
Plaintiff:
Erin Michael McCormack
Defendant:
Clifton Robert Stults, Michael Edward Martinez and Bricks and Figs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinez v. Lamplight Farms Inc.
as 4:2011cv00250
Plaintiff:
Edward Martinez
Defendant:
Lamplight Farms Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SERVENEN et al v. EMPIRECLS WORLDWIDE CHAFFERED SERVICES et al
as 2:2010cv03743
Plaintiff:
ILKER SERVENEN , YASSER ELDASOUKY , FAISAL ABEDRABBO and others
Defendant:
EMPIRECLS WORLDWIDE CHAFFERED SERVICES, DAVID SEELINGER, EDWARD MARTINEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Martinez v. GMAC, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00377
Defendant:
GMAC, Inc., U.S. Bancorp and U.S. Bank National Association
Plaintiff:
Edward Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv02628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Clarke v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv03520
Plaintiff:
Ashley Clarke
Defendant:
The City of New York, Michael Bloomberg, Raymond W. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grimsley v. Faulkner et al
as 3:2009cv00396
Plaintiff:
Glen Grimsley and Glen Grimsley
Defendant:
John M. Faulkner, Edward Martinez, Mario M. Padilla and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1340 Recovery of Erroneous Refund
US v. Juan Alomia-Torres
as 09-7876
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN BAUTISTA ALOMIA-TORRES, a/k/a Juan Baustista-Alomia, a/k/a Luis Antonio Torres, a/k/a Edward Martinez, a/k/a Luis Alfredo Martinez, a/k/a John the Jamaican, a/k/a John
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv02985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
