Cases 1 - 10 of 30
US v. James McDonald
as 22-4516
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD MCDONALD
John McDonald v. Lepher Jenkins
as 20-60872
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden Lepher Jenkins
Petitioner / Appellant:
John Edward McDonald
MCDONALD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv56257
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCDONALD III v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv12519
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD MCDONALD III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCDONALD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv69473
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCDONALD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv04292
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD MCDONALD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. William Jackson
as 19-3630
Defendant:
Pamela Maness, Jerry Lahr, as Trustee for Trinity Consulting, Rock Foundation; Gateway Properties, and Prosperity Leasing, Sharon Jackson and others
Defendant / Appellant:
William Phillip Jackson
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Mastalir et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02204
Plaintiff:
Justin Miller, Larry Dee Mcdonald, Gerald Meidl and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Holdings, LLC, Does 1-50 and others
Elizabeth Sanchez et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2017cv07218
Plaintiff:
A.G., Elizabeth Sanchez and Natividad Sanchez
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles and Edward McDonald
McDonald v. Outlaw
as 3:2016cv00800
Plaintiff:
John Edward McDonald
Defendant:
Timothy Outlaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
