Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Nellson v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2022cv00538
Petitioner:
Edward Nellson
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nellson v. Matevousian et al
as 1:2021cv02710
Plaintiff:
Edward Nellson
Defendant:
Andre Matevousian, Bayer, Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nellson v. Matevousian et al
as 1:2021cv02668
Plaintiff:
Edward Nellson
Defendant:
Andre Matevousian, PA Bayer, PA Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nellson v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2021cv00932
Plaintiff:
Edward Nellson
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Nellson v. John Doe
as 21-6206
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, Warden of USP Hazelton, LEIGH BIRD, JOHN DOE, SHU Lt at USP Hazelton and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD NELLSON
Nellson v. Petry et al
as 5:2020cv00562
Defendant:
Kathryn Arrington, U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Nellson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nellson v. U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv00065
Defendant:
Gregory Mims, Kathryn Arrington, Philip Hlavac and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Nellson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NELLSON v. U.S. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv00788
Defendant:
GREGORY MIMS, KATHRYN ARRINGTON, PHILIP HLAVAC and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD NELLSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nellson v. Barnhart et al
as 1:2020cv00756
Defendant:
Warden J. Barnhart, United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, J. (I) Barnhart and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Nellson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Nellson v. Murry, et al
as 17-5393
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD NELLSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NURSE MURRY, HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR SLONE, NURSE HARRINGTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
