Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Powell v. Danberg et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00558
Plaintiff: Edward Powell
Defendant: Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, Correctional Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Dorning et al
as 5:2009cv01707
Petitioner: John Edward Powell, Jr
Respondent: Blake Dorning and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Powell v. Madison County Alabama
as 5:2009cv01705
Plaintiff: John Edward Powell, Jr
Defendant: Madison County Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Madison County, Alabama et al
as 5:2009cv00865
Plaintiff: John Edward Powell, Jr
Defendant: Madison County, Alabama, Madison County Detention Facility and E Patrick Hill
Miscellaneou: staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Powell
as 08-51117
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: TONY EDWARD POWELL
POWELL v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv89427
Plaintiff: EDWARD POWELL
Defendant: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
Powell v. Smith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv01443
Plaintiff: Tony Edward Powell
Defendant: D. Smith, D. Smith, D. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv05144
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Powell v. USA
as 6:2008cv00183
Petitioner: Tony Edward Powell
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Tony Powell v. D. Smith
as 08-16245
Petitioner - Appellant: TONY EDWARD POWELL
Respondent - Appellee: D. SMITH, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?