Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Robinson et al v. Pfizer Inc.
as 4:2016cv00439
Plaintiff:
Elaine Robinson , Helen Psaras , Rebecca Couture and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2014cv02590
Plaintiff:
Robin Elaine Robinson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Robinson v. J C Penney Company Inc et al
as 7:2014cv01084
Plaintiff:
Ira Elaine Robinson
Defendant:
J C Penney Company Inc , Westgate Mall Limited Partnership , CBL & Associates Properties Inc and others
Cross_claimant:
J C Penney Company Inc
Cross_defendant:
CBL & Associates Properties Inc , ERMC II LP and Westgate Mall Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wise v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2011cv02399
Plaintiff:
Mel Wise
Defendant:
Eric Mendenhall, James Meetze, Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wise v. South Carolina Dept of Correction et al
as 8:2011cv02398
Plaintiff:
Mel Wise
Defendant:
South Carolina Dept of Correction, Elaine Robinson, Sharon Stukes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith Bruce v. Elaine Robinson
as 10-7640
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH BERNARD BRUCE
Respondent - Appellee:
ELAINE ROBINSON, Warden
Twitty v. Robinson et al
as 0:2010cv02661
Plaintiff:
Irving E Twitty
Defendant:
Elaine Robinson, Tijuana L Crisp, Hunter W Elgin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sammie Goodwin v. Elaine Robinson
as 09-7427
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAMMIE GOODWIN
Respondent - Appellee:
ELAINE ROBINSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
