Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 43
LOCAL 456, IBEW, AFL-CIO; LOCAL 456 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT TRUST FUNDS; and TRUSTEES OF LOCAL 456 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT TRUST FUNDS v. SOLAR-MITE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INC.
as 2:2020cv01513
Respondent: SOLAR-MITE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INC.
Petitioner: LOCAL 456, IBEW, AFL-CIO; LOCAL 456 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT TRUST FUNDS; and TRUSTEES OF LOCAL 456 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT TRUST FUNDS
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
National Electrical Benefit Fund v. Great Lakes Electrical Contractors, Inc.
as 1:2018cv08081
Defendant: Great Lakes Electrical Contractors, Inc.
Plaintiff: National Electrical Benefit Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan v. Cico Electrical Contractors, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00618
Defendant: Cico Electrical Contractors, Inc.
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan
Par Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Kenny Construction Company et al
as 4:2018mc00184
Petitioner: PAR Electrical Contractors, Inc.
Respondent: Kenny Construction Company and Electrical Consultants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Southern California Edison Company v. PAR Electrical Contractors, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01989
Defendant: PAR Electrical Contractors, Inc.
Plaintiff: Southern California Edison Company
PHILIPS BROTHERS ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INC. v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2017cv04131
Plaintiff: PHILIPS BROTHERS ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INC.
Defendant: FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11707
DDR Construction Services, LLC v. Schlesinger Electrical Contrac
as 17-2397
Petitioner - Appellant: DDR Construction Services, LLC and Clifford R. Weiner
Respondent - Appellee: Schlesinger Electrical Contractors, Inc and Jacob Levita
Consolidation Coal Company v. 3M Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv00463
Defendant: Veolia Environmental Services Waste-to-Energy, Integrated Electrical Services, Inc., Duke Energy Progress, LLC and others
Consolidated Defendant: Johnson/Kerner Liaison Group
Special Master: David O Ledbetter
3Rd Party Defendant: The North Carolina Granite Corporation, FABRI-KAL Corporation, The National Lime and Stone Company and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Petitioner: United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cross Defendant: Electric Equipment Corporation of Virginia, Cooper Tire & Rubber Company and Huntington Ingalls Incorporated.
Plaintiff: Consolidation Coal Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Duke Energy Progress, LLC v. 3M Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv00460
Defendant: Tennessee Associated Electric, Inc. or Tennessee Associated Electric, Union Electric Company, American Electric Corporation and others
Special Master: David O Ledbetter and Mr. David Oscar Ledbetter
Petitioner: United States Environmental Protection Agency
Plaintiff: Duke Energy Progress, LLC doing business as Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Consolidated Defendant: Johnson/Kerner Liaison Group
3Rd Party Plaintiff: PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant: Barnes & Powell Electrical Company, Inc., Trinity Industries, Inc., Georgia-Pacific, LLC and others
Counter Defendant: Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Cross Claimant: Owen Electric Steel Company of South Carolina and/or SMI-Owen Steel Company, Inc. and/or SMI Steel
Counter Claimant: Ohio Valley Medical Center, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
DDR Construction Services, Inc. et al v. Schlesinger Electrical Contractors, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04454
Petitioner: DDR Construction Services, Inc. and Clifford R. Weiner
Respondent: Jacob Levita and Schlesinger Electrical Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?