Cases 1 - 7 of 7
RATCLIFF v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00174
Defendant:
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC, CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC., L'OREAL USA CREATIVE INC. As Subrogee Of THE MAYBELLINE CO. As Subrogee Of MAYBELLINE INC. doing business as MAYBELLINE formerly known as MAYBELLINE COSMETICS CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
RATCLIFF and JODY E. RATCLIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dull et al v. Energizer Personal Care, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00195
Plaintiff:
Harry Dull , Thomas Lawson , Jeffrey Taylor and others
Defendant:
Energizer Personal Care, LLC, Playtex Products, LLC and Energizer Holdings, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
MARTIN v. EVEREADY BATTERY COMPANY, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv06268
Plaintiff:
THAEDRA EADIE MARTIN
Defendant:
EVEREADY BATTERY COMPANY, INC. , ENERGIZER PERSONAL CARE, LLC , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Calwell v Energizer Personal Care, LLC, et al
as 3:2012cv03635
Plaintiff:
Stuart Calwell
Defendant:
Energizer Personal Care, LLC and Energizer Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Rice v. Energizer Holdings, Inc. et al
as 6:2010cv01878
Plaintiff:
Ronald J. Rice
Defendant:
Energizer Holdings, Inc. , Energizer Personal Care, LLC and Playtex Products, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Energizer Personal Care, LLC , Energizer Holdings, Inc. and Playtex Products, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Ronald J. Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Energizer Holdings, Inc. et al v. Langer Hawaii Corporation
as 1:2009cv00575
Plaintiff:
Energizer Holdings, Inc., Energizer Holdings, Inc., Energizer Personal Care, LLC and others
Defendant:
Langer Hawaii Corporation
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
