Cases 31 - 40 of 170
Hodge v. Epps et al
as 1:2019cv00154
Defendant:
Shelby Epps, Randy Blades, Mark Way and others
Plaintiff:
Robert M Hodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Epps v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv02490
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Antonio Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Torres, et al. v. City of Tulare, et al.
as 1:2019cv00361
Defendant:
Willard Epps, City of Tulare and Wes Hensley
Plaintiff:
Euler Torres and Esau Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres et al v. City of Tulare et al
as 1:2019at00197
Defendant:
Willard Epps, Wes Hensley and City of Tulare
Plaintiff:
Euler Torres and Esau J Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Damon Epps v. Dr. Ha et al
as 2:2019cv01791
Defendant:
Dr. Hernandez and Dr. Ha
Plaintiff:
Robert Damon Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Epps v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv01636
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Antonio Johan Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Epps v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00110
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Kawanta Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Epps v. Columbia Debt Recovery Group, L.L.C.
as 2:2018cv00327
Defendant:
Columbia Debt Recovery Group LLC and Genesis Credit Management LLC
Plaintiff:
Cody Epps
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Carpenter et al v. Trump et al
as 1:2018cv00322
Defendant:
Sgt. Jeff Sanchez, Mayor and Governor of Gainesville, Florida (The), Sean P. Combs and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal Carpenter and Jewel P. Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Epps v. C.R. Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01547
Plaintiff:
Kawanta Devon Epps
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
