Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Frantz v. State of Kansas, et al
as 24-3032
Plaintiff:
BARBARA FRANTZ
Defendant:
STATE OF KANSAS, JEFF ZMUDA, Secretary of Corrections, GLORIA GEITHER, Warden, Topeka correctional facility and others
Frantz (ID 124145) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2023cv03246
Defendant:
Michelle (lnu), Kansas, State of, Jeff Zmuda and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Marie Frantz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Erb v. Superintendent Huntingdon SCI, et al
as 23-2599
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL J. ERB
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Williams v. Williams et al
as 5:2021cv03165
Petitioner:
Carlos Jawon Williams
Respondent:
Eric N. Williams and Matthew R. Erb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Albrecht et al v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00196
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fowler, Toren Pruden, Charles Withrow and others
Defendant:
Sue Washburn, Paula Myers, Ken Jeske and others
Petitioner:
Miles Erb, Leroy Lamont Wells and Serafin Pahua-Pahua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ERB v. KAUFFMAN
as 2:2020cv03492
Petitioner:
DANIEL J. ERB
Respondent:
KEVIN KAUFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peters v. Palmer et al
as 5:2020cv03015
Plaintiff:
Deizmond Curtis Peters
Defendant:
Justin Edwards, Margaret McIntire, Michelle Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hines v. Calif Dept. of Corr and Rehab et al
as 3:2019cv00450
Defendant:
Jaffomo, Inc., Saff MD Inc (Beerman), Tatina Klmo and others
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ANDERSON v. BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2018cv00103
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. ANDERSON
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA , FRED B. MILLER , PAULA M. AIGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
