Cases 11 - 20 of 45
LINDA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv00363
Plaintiff:
LINDA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR. and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
YUBA COUNTY WATER AGENCY v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv00352
Plaintiff:
YUBA COUNTY WATER AGENCY
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR. and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
CITY OF FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv00201
Plaintiff:
CITY OF FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR. and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
O'NEAL v. PRETRIAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2013cv00179
Plaintiff:
LAFRANCES DUDLEY O'NEAL
Defendant:
PRETRIAL SERVICES , U.S PROBATION DEPARTMENT , U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CITY OF WHEATLAND, CALIFORNIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv00054
Plaintiff:
CITY OF WHEATLAND, CALIFORNIA
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR. and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01235
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Navarro v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv01803
Plaintiff:
Jim Navarro
Defendant:
United States of America, Eric Ken Shinseki, Michael J Astrue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
