Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Meyer et al v. Marion, Kansas, City of et al
as 2:2024cv02122
Plaintiff:
Eric Meyer and Hoch Publishing Co., Inc., The doing business as Marion County Record
Defendant:
Marion, Kansas, City of, David Mayfield, Gideon Cody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Advance Trading, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Barone et al
as 1:2023cv01390
Plaintiff:
Advance Trading, Inc.
Defendant:
Craig Barone, Craig Robertson, Fred Dietz and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
IN RE ONIX GROUP, LLC DATA BREACH LITIGATION
as 2:2023cv02288
Plaintiff:
ERIC MEYERS, DONALD OWENS, AIDA ALBINO WIMBUSH and others
Defendant:
ONIX GROUP, LLC and ADDICTION RECOVERY SYSTEMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
J. W. 1 et al v. City of Glendale et al
as 2:2023cv03006
Plaintiff:
J. W. 1 and J. W. 2
Defendant:
City of Glendale, Nicholas Anderson, Francisco Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ron A. Rosen Janfaza et al v. City of Glendale et al
as 2:2023cv01312
Plaintiff:
Ron A. Rosen Janfaza
Defendant:
Officer Christopher Spencer, City of Glendale, City of Glendale Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Eric Meyer v. BMW of North America, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00063
Plaintiff:
Eric Meyer
Defendant:
BMW of North America, LLC and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Meyer v. U.S. Marshals
as 3:2019cv01815
Plaintiff:
Eric Meyer
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
