Cases 1 - 10 of 328
Steven Pannebaker v. Karin Trotta, et al
as 24-2245
Plaintiff:
STEVEN PANNEBAKER
Defendant:
ERIC SMITH, Dentist at SCI-Mahanoy, JOHN STEINHART, Corrections Health Care Administrator and KARIN TROTTA, Dentist at SCI-Mahanoy
Feinberg v. Cintron et al
as 1:2024cv01957
Defendant:
Jeff Enders, Laval Miller-Wilson, Vincent Paese and others
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Michael Eric Smith v. Los Angeles County Sherriff's Department
as 5:2024cv01246
Plaintiff:
Michael Eric Smith
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Sherriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. WELLPATH et al
as 2:2024cv02520
Plaintiff:
ERIC SMITH
Defendant:
WELLPATH, DR. ANNINO, DR. LETIZIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. City of North Branch, Minnesota
as 0:2024cv01868
Plaintiff:
Eric Smith
Defendant:
City of North Branch, Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00324
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Carlton Eric Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Soto v. Barner et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Darius Jason Soto
Defendant:
Reginald Barner, Morgan Stephenson, Eric Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Moliere Dimanche, Jr. v. Takela Jackson, et al
as 24-11267
Plaintiff:
MOLIERE DIMANCHE, JR.
Defendant:
TAKELA JACKSON, RABIH TABBARA, NICOLAS LUCIANO MONTES and others
Cochran v. Wood et al
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thomas Cochran
Defendant:
Sheriff Lenn Wood, Major Eric Smith, Sgt Josh Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
