Cases 1 - 10 of 18
RANSOM v. WEBB et al
as 4:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
KELVIN CHARLES RANSOM, SR
Defendant:
D ERIC WEBB, JENNIFER B WEBB and ALLESANDRO RAIMONDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POPE v. GEORGIA et al
as 4:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE WAYNE POPE
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, JULIA SLATER, Sheriff JEFF WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEBB v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19466
Plaintiff:
ERIC WEBB
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00022
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Brandon Wheeler v. Mark Kidder, et al
as 20-3292
Defendant / Appellant:
Mark Kidder, Individually, Adam Sexton, Individually and Nick Darnell, Individually
Defendant:
City of Searcy, Arkansas, Eric Webb, John Does and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Brandon Lee Wheeler
WEBB v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv73580
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID ERIC WEBB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEBB v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv02530
Plaintiff:
ERIC WEBB
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wheeler v. Searcy Arkansas, City of et al
as 4:2018cv00859
Defendant:
Nick Darnell, Mark Kidder, Eric Webb and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James et al v. United States of America
as 2:2018cv02166
Plaintiff:
Sandra James and Ken James
Defendant:
Dr. Patrick Fox, United States of America, The and Eric Webb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
English v. Searcy Arkansas, City of et al
as 4:2017cv00776
Plaintiff:
Ryan A English
Defendant:
Searcy Arkansas, City of, Chris R Brown, Kevin E Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
