Cases 1 - 10 of 983
LUCAS v. BRITTAIN et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
KEYON LUCAS
Respondent:
KATHY J. BRITTAIN, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR ERIE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shomo v. State of New York
as 24-818
Plaintiff:
JOSE SHOMO
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, STEWART ECKERT, Superintendent, individually and in official capacity and others
D'Angelo v. Erie County Sheriffs Office et al
as 1:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Carlo Robert D'Angelo
Defendant:
Erie County Sheriffs Office, 3 Unknown Erie County Sheriffs Officers and Niagara Radisson Hotel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Richard Weber v. County of Erie, et al
as 24-1477
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EDWARD WEBER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ERIE, ERIE COUNTY PRISON, WARDEN BRYANT and others
HARRIS v. SOLANE et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
COREY L. HARRIS, SR.
Defendant:
NICOLE SOLANE, JUDGE MARSHALL J. PICCININI, COMMONWEALTH OF PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. SUTTER et al
as 1:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
COREY L. HARRIS, SR.
Respondent:
WARDEN SUTTER and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Frein v. Erie County Crisis Services
as 24-495
Plaintiff:
CHAD M. FREIN
Defendant:
ERIE COUNTY CRISIS SERVICES
TICE v. WILSON et al.
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBERT TICE
Defendant:
HARRY E. WILSON, PA STATE POLICE, MEGAN'S LAW SECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In Re: Timothy C. Saunders
as 24-1293
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY C. SAUNDERS
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
