Cases 41 - 50 of 236
Lindsey v. Cooper et al
as 5:2020ct03356
Plaintiff:
Mareese Lindsey and Mareese Lindsey Bey
Defendant:
Brandeshawn Harris, Todd E. Ishee, Erik A Hooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES-EL v. COOPER et al
as 1:2020cv01064
Defendant:
ERIK A. HOOKS, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DAC and others
Plaintiff:
HARRY SHAROD JAMES-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Hooks
as 5:2020cv00182
Respondent:
Katy Poole and Erik A. Hooks
Petitioner:
Shawn Dewayne Parks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
QUICK v. COOPER et al
as 1:2020cv00979
Defendant:
TIMOTHY D. MOORE, ERIK A. HOOKS, BRANDESHAWN HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
LAMONT QUICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STOKES v. HOOKS
as 1:2020cv00968
Respondent:
ERIK A. HOOKS
Petitioner:
GEORGE VICTOR STOKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coleman et al v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety et al
as 3:2020cv00570
Defendant:
Ronald M. Rene, Erik A. Hooks, North Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Plaintiff:
Tangy Coleman and Derrick Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALDWIN v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2020cv00922
Defendant:
KATE POOLE, ERIK A. HOOKS, DEAN LOCKLEAR and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH TREMAYNE BALDWIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES-EL v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2020cv00902
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DAC, ERIK A. HOOKS, PAULA JONES and others
Plaintiff:
HARRY SHAROD JAMES-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee et al v. Hooks et al
as 5:2020ct03307
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Galvin, Isaam Chaplin and Dominique Lee
Defendant:
John Doe 1-2, Erik A. Hooks, D. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SYMMES v. COVINGTON et al
as 1:2020cv00887
Defendant:
VICTOR LOCKLEAR, ANGELA M. DELLARIPA, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
