Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Anthony Martin v. Correct Care Recovery Solutions
as 23-6875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY SHANE MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECT CARE RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, ERIN GAFFNEY, Facility Administrator, BRIAN DAVIS, Security Administrator and others
Anthony Martin v. Erin Gaffney
as 23-6870
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY SHANE MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIN GAFFNEY, LISA YOUNG, RAY WALKER and others
Defendant:
WELLPATH/CORRECT CARE
Martin v. Wellpath/Correct Care et al
as 4:2022cv02042
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shane Martin
Defendant:
Wellpath/Correct Care, Erin Gaffney, Lisa Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Martin v. Correct Care Recovery Solutions
as 4:2022cv02043
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shane Martin
Defendant:
Correct Care Recovery Solutions, Erin Gaffney, Brian Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Hamm v. South Carolina Department of Mental Health et al
as 9:2021cv03084
Plaintiff:
Michael E Hamm
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Mental Health, John Magill, Sexually Violent Predator Treatment Program Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Riley et al
as 1:2019cv11545
Defendant:
Joshua Macy, Geralyn Riley, Jaileen Hopkins and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooley v. Gaffney
as 1:2018cv10258
Petitioner:
Edward Cooley
Respondent:
Erin Gaffney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Blodgett v. Gaffney
as 1:2017cv12501
Petitioner:
John J. Blodgett
Respondent:
Erin Gaffney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davila v. Gaffney et al
as 1:2017cv12494
Plaintiff:
Jose Davila
Defendant:
Erin Gaffney and Joe Lima
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caruso v. Gaffney
as 1:2017cv11822
Petitioner:
Steven Caruso
Respondent:
Erin Gaffney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
