Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
DANIELS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv53579
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ERNEST DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DANIELS JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv19739
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ERNEST DANIELS JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DANIELS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv23318
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ERNEST DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv09726
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ernest Daniel Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Medina v. John Doe
as 1:2014cv01205
Plaintiff:
Ernest Daniel Medina
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina v. City and County of Denver et al
as 1:2013cv02755
Plaintiff:
Ernest Daniel Medina
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, Denver County Sheriff's Dept. and Cannon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Grimes et al
as 4:2012cv00137
Plaintiff:
Ernest Daniels
Defendant:
Unknown Grimes, Unknown Show and Staff Members, Employee of EMCF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ernest Medina v. Thomas Cahill, et al
as 12-56266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNEST DANIEL MEDINA
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS G. CAHILL, M.D., KATHY KALEM, Patient Rights Advocate,official capacity, LUCAS CAMPOS, Patients Right Advocate, official capacity and others
Ernest Medina v. Mark Fagnon, et al
as 12-56239
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNEST DANIEL MEDINA
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK FAGNON and LOU GOMEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
