Cases 21 - 30 of 975
Arredondo Esquivel v. East Coast Tree Care, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Cledin Emilson Arredondo Esquivel
Defendant:
East Coast Tree Care, Inc., Sharon Catherine Schmitt and Michele Marie Sheckells
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00027
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Esquivel-Luna v. Marion County Jail et al
as 6:2023cv01923
Plaintiff:
Jesus Javier Esquivel-Luna
Defendant:
Marion County Jail and Marion County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Esquivel et al v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Monica Esquivel and Gustavo Esquivel
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023at01289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wise et al v. Lyft, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv04663
Plaintiff:
Dylan Wise and Marisela Esquivel
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Esquivel-Luna v. Marion County Sheriff Department
as 6:2023cv01836
Plaintiff:
Jesus Javier Esquivel-Luna
Defendant:
Marion County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
