Cases 1 - 10 of 13
ROSS, SR. v. ESSEX COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 2:2023cv03122
Plaintiff:
HAROLD ANTHONY ROSS, SR.
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, HONORABLE DAVID KATZ, J.S.C, HONORABLE ARTHUR BATISTA, J.S.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bezalel Grossberger v. Superior Court of Essex County, et al
as 22-3110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BEZALEL GROSSBERGER
Defendant / Appellee:
ESSEX COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, FAST OIL LLC and ROBERT CORMACK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv14648
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Anthony Auriemma v. Bloomfield Municipal Court, et al
as 20-1819
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY FEE ARBITRATION, ESSEX COUNTY ETHICS COMMITTEE, ESSEX COUNTY LANDLORD TENANT COURT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY AURIEMMA
Donahue v. Essex County Superior Court
as 1:2020cv10663
Petitioner:
Jennifer Donahue
Respondent:
Essex County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
AURIEMMA V. BLOOMFIELD MUNICIPAL COURT, et al.
as 2:2020cv02612
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY FEE ARBITRATION, ESSEX COUNTY ETHICS COMMITTEE, BRICK MUNICIPALITY and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY AURIEMMA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JAMES v. ESSEX COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 2:2016cv01960
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and MILLBURN MUNICIPAL COURT
Plaintiff:
RICKY J JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARINO v. ESSEX COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
as 2:2013cv07267
Plaintiff:
ROSALINDA O. CARINO
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarosz v. Essex County Superior Court
as 1:2012cv12098
Plaintiff:
Barbara A Jarosz
Defendant:
Essex County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CAREY v. ESSEX COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
as 2:2012cv01776
Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA MICHAEL CAREY
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
