Cases 1 - 10 of 438
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ESTEVEZ v. CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00800
Plaintiff:
VINCE ESTEVEZ
Defendant:
CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC. and COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Interested Party:
KENNETH HASSON
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 133
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
ESTEVEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv30083
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ESTEVEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
United States of America v. Ayers (Smith)
as 23-7119
Defendant:
DERRICK AYERS, BERMON CLARKE, NIA GOVAN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMEL SMITH
Holmes et al v. McDonald's USA, LLC
as 0:2023cv61603
Plaintiff:
Philana Holmes, Humberto Caraballo Estevez and O. V. C.
Defendant:
McDonald's USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Espada et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv06186
Plaintiff:
Milton Espada, Arthur Kill Properties, LLC and Plaza Body Shop, Inc.
Defendant:
City of New York, New York Police Department Captain Glorisel Lee, New York Police Department Lieutenant Miguel Estevez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Estevez v. McDonough
as 23-2284
Claimant:
EMILIO ESTEVEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
