Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Perez v. Valdes et al
as 1:2024cv20841
Plaintiff:
Gaddiel David Perez
Defendant:
Esther V. Valdes and Narciso G. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
P. et al v. Uvalde et al
as 1:2022cv01252
Plaintiff:
Crystal P., Daniel P., Andrea V. and others
Defendant:
City of Uvalde, Uvalde City Police Department, Uvalde Consolidated Independent School District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
C. et al v. Daniel Defense, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01251
Plaintiff:
Jasmine C., M. C., D. P. and others
Defendant:
Daniel Defense, LLC, Daniel Defense, INC and Oasis Outback, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv80559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Kelsey v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Esther V. Kelsey
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
WARD v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv16937
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
ESTHER V. WARD
Defendant:
IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC ("IMERYS TALC"), JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washburn v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03882
Plaintiff:
Esther V. Washburn
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Friedmann v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv04929
Plaintiff:
Esther V. Friedmann
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
