Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Armida Ruelas, et al v. County of Alameda, et al
as 21-16528
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ARMIDA RUELAS, DE'ANDRE EUGENE COX, BERT DAVIS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, SHERIFF GREGORY J. AHERN and ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC
Armida Ruelas, et al v. County of Alameda, et al
as 21-80075
Respondent:
ARMIDA RUELAS, DE'ANDRE EUGENE COX, BERT DAVIS and others
Petitioner:
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, SHERIFF GREGORY J. AHERN and ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC
COX v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv76993
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LENARD EUGENE COX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ruelas et al v. County of Alameda et al
as 4:2019cv07637
Plaintiff:
LUIS NUNEZ-ROMERO, DE'ANDRE EUGENE COX, Armida Ruelas and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, SHERIFF Gregory J. Ahern and ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00580
Plaintiff:
Farley Eugene Cox
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production Inc.
Cox v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10460
Plaintiff:
Farley Eugene Cox
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Bohning et al v. The City and State of New York
as 1:2017cv06441
Plaintiff:
Peter Bohning, Jose Pizarro, Juel Roundtree and others
Defendant:
The City and State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bohning et al
as 1:2016cv02078
Plaintiff:
Peter Bohning, Juel Roundtree, Eugene Cox and others
Defendant:
State of New York and New York City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lonnie Cox v. Jeffrey Uttecht
as 12-72732
Petitioner:
LONNIE EUGENE COX
Respondent:
JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden
Cox v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2012cv00046
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Cox
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
