Cases 1 - 10 of 113
Johnson v. USA
as 1:2024cv00016
Petitioner:
Carlos Eugene Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02407
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Johnson v. Keys et al
as 6:2023cv01752
Plaintiff:
William Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
Chaplain Teddy Keys, Assistant Warden Charles Driggers, Secretary Department Of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darrell Johnson v. USA
as 23-12529
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARRELL EUGENE JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Johnson v. Tampa Police Department et al
as 8:2023cv01662
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
Tampa Police Department, Unknown Deputy and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Pasco County Detention Center et al
as 8:2023cv01105
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
Pasco County Detention Center, State of Florida, Pasco County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Johnson v. Bolanos et al
as 3:2023cv01533
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
Carlos Bolanos, San Mateo County and San Mateo County Board of Supervisors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Bower et al
as 2:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Eugene Johnson, III
Defendant:
Ernest Bower, Tanya Blair, Dupree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
