Cases 21 - 30 of 219
Woods v. Johnson
as 8:2022cv02913
Plaintiff:
Lucian Woods
Defendant:
Eugene Johnson
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Woods et al v. Johnson
as 8:2022cv02919
Plaintiff:
Leslie Woods and Anthony Means
Defendant:
Eugene Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Johnson et al v. Prescott, City of et al
as 3:2022cv08180
Plaintiff:
Eugene Johnson and Jimmie Johnson
Defendant:
Prescott, City of and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Darrell Eugene Johnson v. Dr. Joseph Cruz et al
as 2:2022cv06610
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. Joseph Cruz and Dr. John Blaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Superior Court of California
as 3:2022cv05613
Petitioner:
Darrell Eugene Johnson
Respondent:
Superior Court of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darrell Johnson v. Superior Court of California County of San Mateo
as 22-70201
Petitioner:
DARRELL EUGENE JOHNSON
Respondent:
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
Johnson v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2022cv02913
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
C.R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Pasco County Detention Center et al (Pasco County)
as 8:2022cv01562
Petitioner:
Ronald Eugene Johnson
Respondent:
Pasco County Detention Center, Sheriff Chris Nocco and Chris Nocco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darrell Eugene Johnson v. Josie Gastelo et al
as 2:2022cv04158
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
Josie Gastelo and Joseph A. Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Gastelo et al
as 3:2022cv02581
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
Josie Gastelo and Joseph A Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
