Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Pitts v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv19765
Plaintiff:
Ernest Eugene Pitts
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Michael Pitts v. Richard Glasser
as 12-1134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL EUGENE PITTS, ARTHUR EUGENE PITTS, JR., a/k/a Sean Michael Pitts, DEBRA LYNN PITTS-RYLES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD GLASSER, Esq. et al, BETH VAUGHN, Esq., HORTENSIA PITTS and others
Pitts et al v. Glasser et al
as 2:2011cv00337
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Pitts, Arthur Eugene Pitts, Jr., Debra Lynn Pitts-Ryles and others
Defendant:
Richard Glasser, Beth Vaughn, Hortensia Pitts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fierro v. City of Atlanta Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00223
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Tapia Fierro
Defendant:
City of Atlanta Department of Corrections, Frank Sizer, P. Doggett and others
Pitts v. Broward County Sheriff
as 0:2009cv60835
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Pitts
Defendant:
Broward County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2007cv03059
Plaintiff:
James Wesley Hunt
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Shirley Franklin, Thomas J. Pocock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Warden at Dade Correctional Instutition et al
as 1:2007cv21820
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Pitts
Defendant:
Warden at Dade Correctional Instutition and J. Poveda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
