Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5287
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Natl Assn of Immigration Judges v. David Neal
as 23-2235
Plaintiff / Appellant: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF IMMIGRATION JUDGES, affiliated with the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID L. NEAL, in his official capacity as Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review
Sotomayor Mendez et al v. United States Citizens and Immigration Services et al
as 3:2023cv01470
Plaintiff: Wilmer Oclander Sotomayor Mendez and Franco Mathias Sotomayor Matos
Defendant: United States Citizens and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Thomas Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD et al v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION REVIEW et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00852
Plaintiff: NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD, ENRIQUE NAPOLES VAILLANT, ARLETY ALIAGA-COBAS and others
Defendant: IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, JAMES MCHENRY, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION REVIEW and others
Amicus Curiae: FORMER FEDERAL IMMIGRATION JUDGES, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF IMMIGRATION JUDGES, FORMER IMMIGRATION JUDGES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
SINGH v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv00805
Defendant: DEITRICH SIMS, WILLIAM P. BARR and EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW
Plaintiff: HARPREET SINGH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Padilla et al v. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00928
Plaintiff: Yolany Padilla , Ibis Guzman , Blanca Orantes and others
Defendant: US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, US Department of Homeland Security, US Customs and Border Protection and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Northwest Immigrant Rights Project et al v. Sessions, III et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00716
Plaintiff: Northwest Immigrant Rights Project and Yuk Man Maggie Cheng
Defendant: Jefferson B Sessions, III , United States Department of Justice , Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Amicu: Attorney General of Washington and American Civil Liberties Union of Washington (ACLU)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Xochitl Hernandez, et al v. Loretta Lynch, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-56829
Plaintiff - Appellee: XOCHITL HERNANDEZ, for themselves and on behalf of a class of similarly-situated individuals and CESAR MATIAS, for themselves and on behalf of a class of similarly-situated individuals
Defendant - Appellant: LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, JUAN P. OSUNA, Director, Executive Office for Immigration Review, JEH JOHNSON, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and others
Jacqueline Stevens v. U.S. Attorney General, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-12007
Plaintiff - Appellant: JACQUELINE STEVENS
Defendant - Appellee: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, JUAN OSUNA, Director, Executive Office of Immigration Review, in his official capacity, FRAN MOONEY, Assistant Director for the Office of Management Programs, Executive Office of Immigration Review in her individual and official capacity and others
: SERVICE
J. F.M., et al v. Loretta Lynch, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-35738
Plaintiff - Appellee: J. E. F.M., a minor, by and through his Next Friend, Bob Ekblad, J. F.M., a minor, by and through his Next Friend Bob Ekblad, D. G. F.M., a minor, by and through her Next Friend, Bob Ekblad and others
Defendant - Appellant: LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, JUAN P. OSUNA, Director, Executive Office for Immigration Review, JEH JOHNSON, Secretary, Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FORMER FEDERAL IMMIGRATION JUDGES and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?