Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5406
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thorpe v. DHL Express (USA), Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02035
Plaintiff:
Mark Thorpe et al. and Mark Thorpe
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA), Inc. et al, DHL Express (USA), Inc. doing business as DHL Express and Exel Inc. doing business as DHL Supply Chain (USA)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01950
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zajdel et al v. Exel Inc., a Foreign Corp. d/b/a DHL Supply Chain (USA) et al
as 2:2021cv12026
Plaintiff:
Malory Zajdel and Adam Zajdel
Defendant:
Exel Inc., a Foreign Corp. d/b/a DHL Supply Chain (USA) and Matthew Paul Bohland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00416
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel v. MemberSelect Insurance Company et al
as 2:2021cv11078
Defendant:
MemberSelect Insurance Company, Anthem BlueCross and BlueShield, Exel Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lynn Daniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
LAFAYETTE v. EXEL, INC.
as 2:2020cv02521
Plaintiff:
CHANDRELLE LAFAYETTE
Defendant:
DHL EXPRESS (USA), INC. and Exel Inc. doing business as DHL Supply Chain (USA)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kagey v. Exel, Inc.
as 5:2020cv00772
Defendant:
Exel, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Kagey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Hamernick v. Daniels et al
as 1:2019cv00119
Defendant:
Donyale Daniels and Exel Inc.
Plaintiff:
Josiah Hamernick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ricky Whitmore v. Elmeaco Mallory, et al
as 19-3345
Defendant / Appellee:
ELMEACO MALLORY, CHERYL MABRY-THOMAS, Director - E.E.O.C. and EXEL, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY WHITMORE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
