Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 143
The Board of County Commissioners of St. Mary's County, Maryland v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 8:2023cv03224
Plaintiff: Board of County Commissioners of St. Mary's County, Maryland and The Board of County Commissioners of St. Mary's County, Maryland
Defendant: Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, Maryland v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 1:2023cv03081
Plaintiff: Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, Maryland
Defendant: Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Spokane County v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2023cv00324
Defendant: Evernorth Health Inc, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc and others
Plaintiff: Spokane County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Alexandria, Virginia v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 1:2023cv01547
Plaintiff: City of Alexandria, Virginia
Defendant: Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc., Evernorth Health, Inc. (Formerly Express Scripts Holding Company) and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
County Board of Arlington County, Virginia v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 1:2023cv01504
Plaintiff: County Board of Arlington County, Virginia
Defendant: Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION et al v. SMITH, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv08761
Plaintiff: ROCHE DIABETES CARE, INC. and ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION
Cross Defendant: MERCATO MANAGEMENT, LLC, MERCATO PARTNERS AI II, L.P., KESMAN HUGHES & COMPANY, LLC and others
Defendant: SAHILY PAOLINE, MERCATO PARTNERS GROWTH II, L.P., MERCATO PARTNERS INGRAM CO-INVEST, LLC and others
Cross Claimant: JEFFREY C. SMITH
3Rd Party Plaintiff: ZIONS BANCORPORATION, N.A.
Special Master: THE HONORABLE DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH
Interested Party: Bradley W. Howard and Jeffrey S. Baird
3Rd Party Defendant: EXPRESS SCRIPTS HOLDING COMPANY D/B/A EXPRESS SCRIPTS, CVS CAREMARK, XYZ Corporation Pharmacy Benefit Managers 1-99 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SCHENECTADY COUNTY, NEW YORK v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv20375
Defendant: EVERNORTH HEALTH, INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC. and others
Plaintiff: SCHENECTADY COUNTY, NEW YORK
In Re: INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, et al v. Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv07604
Plaintiff: MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, a Delaware Series Limited Liability Company, MSPA Claims 1, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, MSP Recovery Claims Series 44, LLC, a Delaware Series Limited Liability Company and others
Defendant: Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc., Caring Voice Coalition, Inc., an Idaho non-profit corporation, Adira Foundation, a Virginia non-profit corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
LIVINGSTON COUNTY, NEW YORK v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv18351
Plaintiff: LIVINGSTON COUNTY, NEW YORK
Defendant: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC and others
In Re: INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CORTLAND COUNTY, NEW YORK v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv18314
Plaintiff: CORTLAND COUNTY, NEW YORK
Defendant: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC and others
In Re: INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?