Cases 41 - 50 of 79
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2011cv01960
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kurt F. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hicks v. Bal et al
as 2:2010cv03349
Plaintiff:
Michael J Hicks
Defendant:
J. Bal, P. Sahota, V. Gemmit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Bal et al
as 1:2010cv02307
Plaintiff:
Michael J Hicks
Defendant:
J. Bal, P. Sahota, V. Gemmit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McQueen et al v. Edwards et al
as 3:2010cv00038
Plaintiff:
James McQueen, Kevin M Sorrow, Tony Nix and others
Defendant:
Ira Edwards, Jr., Burke, F Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Edwards et al
as 3:2010cv00029
Plaintiff:
Lee Dell Smith
Defendant:
Ira Edwards, James Burke, F Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Johnson v. Adrian Fenty, et al
as 10-5105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James F. Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
Anthony A. Williams, Mayor, Adrian Fenty, Mayor, Paul Alonzo Quander, Jr., Director, Court Services Supervision Agency and others
Thelma Williams, Jr. v. R. Johnson, et al
as 10-1078
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Thelma Williams, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
R. Johnson, Lt., Varner Unit, ADC, Joe Page, Lt., Varner Unit, ADC (originally sued as Page), Steven Jackson, Sgt., Varner Unit, ADC (originally sued as Jackson) and others
Johnson v. J Levy Dabadie Correctional Center
as 3:2009cv00984
Plaintiff:
Michael F Johnson
Defendant:
Warden J Levy Dabadie Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. J Levy Dabadie Correctional Center
as 6:2009cv01907
Plaintiff:
Michael F Johnson
Defendant:
Warden J Levy Dabadie Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luster v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2009cv00832
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Luster
Defendant:
Kenneth Jones, Sandra Giles, Sylvester Nettles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
