Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Warden
as 22-6434
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, F.C.I. Beckley, W.Va., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Banks v. Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2015cv06979
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Banks
Defendant:
Bureau of Prison F.C.I. Beckley, West Virginia and Joe Coakley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wilson v. F.C.I. Beckley
as 5:2013cv22469
Plaintiff:
Maleak Wilson
Defendant:
F.C.I. Beckley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. F.C.I. Beckley Med. Staff Employees et al
as 5:2011cv00530
Plaintiff:
Steve Jones
Defendant:
F.C.I. Beckley Med. Staff Employees, Mr. White, Mrs. Lilly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jason King v. US
as 12-6212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON W. KING
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et. al., FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et. al., MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, et. al. and others
Larry Bynum v. FNU Slagel, et al
as 10-6293
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY J. BYNUM
Defendant - Appellee:
FNU SLAGEL, FNU BOWMAN, DAVID ELLIS, Chief Psychologist, F.C.I. Beckley and others
McLendon v. United States Of America et al
as 7:2010cv00240
Defendant:
Mr. Frank Adair, All Employees at F.C.I. Beckley, WV, All Employees at F.C.I. Jessup and others
Plaintiff:
Juan P. McLendon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Larry Bynum v. FNU Slagel, et al
as 09-6138
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY J. BYNUM
Respondent - Appellee:
FNU SLAGEL, FNU BOWMAN, DAVID ELLIS, Chief Psychologist, F.C.I. Beckley and others
JEFFERSON et al v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
as 2:2009cv00531
Petitioner:
RICHARD S. JEFFERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY and WARDEN OF F.C.I. BECKLEY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
King v. United States of America et al
as 5:2009cv00068
Plaintiff:
Jason W. King
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Michael B. Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
