Cases 1 - 10 of 95
TUDELA et al v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 3:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Michael Tudela and Abbey Tudela
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, VANDERBURGH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, Vanderburgh County Former Prosecutor Nicholas Hermann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vela v. Lewis et al
as 4:2023cv03376
Plaintiff:
Rodolpho Vela
Defendant:
Anthony Lewis, Chance Talbott, Louis Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Fairchild v. Cundiff et al
as 1:2023cv01972
Plaintiff:
Telem Fairchild
Defendant:
Inspector Cundiff, P.O. Strazzante #8496, P.O. McDermott #6435 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Fairchild v. Elliot et al
as 1:2022cv01894
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gabriel Fairchild
Defendant:
Frank "Pete" Elliot, Gordon D. Sanchez, Raymond Tomsick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowie et al v. Automax Used Cars LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00393
Defendant:
Mario Fairchild and Automax Used Cars LLC
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bowie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03047
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00397
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00496
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
