Cases 1 - 9 of 9
McDonald v. Federal Communications Commission et al
as 3:2019cv00072
Petitioner:
Jessie D. McDonald
Respondent:
Tennessee Elections Commission and Federal Communications Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Emrit v. Soros et al
as 1:2019cv00019
Defendant:
Federal Communications Commission, Securities Exchange Commission, George Soros and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antoine Ray v. Bragg, et al
as 12-5880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTOINE MARQUIS RAY
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRANCE BRAGG, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and others
Antoine Ray v. Ron Simmons, et al
as 12-5861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTOINE MARQUIS RAY
Defendant - Appellee:
RON SIMMONS, N.A.A.C.P., CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Ray v. Bragg
as 1:2012cv00217
Plaintiff:
Antoine Marquis Ray
Defendant:
Terrance Bragg, Central Intelligence Agency, Federal Communications Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ray v. Simmons et al
as 1:2012cv00216
Plaintiff:
Antoine Marquis Ray
Defendant:
Ron Joseph Simmons, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Federal Communications Commission
as 1:2011cv00354
Plaintiff:
Antoine Ray
Defendant:
Federal Communications Commission, 2002 Congress, Senate & House of Representative and Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gamache v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 5:2011cv00098
Plaintiff:
Greg Gamache
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and Federal Communications Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gamache v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 1:2011cv00055
Plaintiff:
Greg Gamache
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and Federal Communications Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
