Cases 31 - 40 of 83
RIDLEY v. DOE et al
as 4:2019cv00553
Defendant:
JANE DOE, BRADFORD RIGBY, ANN HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHESTNUT v. CANADY et al
as 4:2019cv00271
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT
Defendant:
JOHN TOMASINO, CLERK FLORIDA SUPREME COURT, CHARLES CANADY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Millirens v. Florida Supreme Court
as 9:2019cv80413
Plaintiff:
William Millirens
Defendant:
Florida Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Liviz v. Supreme Court of the United State of America, et al
as 1:2018cv12620
Defendant:
Michigan Supreme Court, Louisiana Supreme Court, Kansas Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff:
Chief Jurist ilya Liviz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
David Harper v. State Bar of California, et al
as 18-16326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ANTHONY HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA STATE BAR COURT, CLERK OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE BAR COURT and others
Harper v. State Bar of California et al
as 3:2018cv01630
Plaintiff:
David A. Harper
Defendant:
State Bar of California, California State Bar Court, Clerk of the California State Bar Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Barkdull et al
as 9:2018cv80143
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Taylor
Defendant:
Thomas H. Barkdull, III, Jonathan D Gerber, Martha C. Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jerry Alfred v. Florida Supreme Court
as 17-13580
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY NEIL ALFRED
Respondent - Appellee:
FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
NELSON v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv01186
Plaintiff:
JAMES NELSON
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HARRY SHORTSTEIN, NAT GLOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
