Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Taggart v. D'Amico et al
as 2:2026cv00855
Plaintiff:
George Christopher Taggart and Chris Taggart
Defendant:
Sharon D'Amico, Aimee Griffiths, FNU Durrant and others
Unknown:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mathis v. CoreCivic of Tennessee et al
as 1:2025cv00256
Plaintiff:
Eugenio S. Mathis
Defendant:
CoreCivic of Tennessee doing business as CoreCivic, Inc., Correctional Medicine Associates, P.C., Cibola General Hospital, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mathis v. CoreCivic Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv00158
Plaintiff:
Eugenio S. Mathis
Defendant:
CoreCivic of Tennessee doing business as CoreCivic Inc., Correctional Medicine Associates, P.C., Cibola General Hospital, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Torres v. Warden Cole et al
as 4:2020cv00062
Defendant:
Warden Cole, Bullock, FNU Bullock and others
Plaintiff:
Edgardo Ruvalcaba Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MCCLARY v. BULLOCK et al
as 1:2019cv00023
Plaintiff:
RONALD MCCLARY
Defendant:
FNU OWENS, FNU JOHNSON, FNU BULLOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Solomon et al
as 3:2017cv00311
Plaintiff:
Willie T. Kelly, Jr.
Defendant:
George T. Solomon, R. D. Mitchell, Alfred William and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Ketter v. Aaron et al
as 3:2014cv00618
Plaintiff:
Quincy Teeyon Ketter
Defendant:
David Aaron, Sally Tripplet, FNU Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. BULLOCK
as 1:2011cv00440
Petitioner:
SYLVESTER HALL
Respondent:
FNU BULLOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall v. Bullock
as 3:2011cv00250
Petitioner:
Sylvester Hall
Respondent:
FNU Bullock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Strong v. Werholtz et al
as 5:2011cv03090
Plaintiff:
Calvin L. Strong
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz, David McKune, Ray Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
