Cases 11 - 20 of 73
Abreu v. Davis County et al
as 1:2021cv00129
Plaintiff:
Angel Christopher Abreu
Defendant:
Davis County, Davis County Jail, Cole Meldrum and others
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ahmed v. Donley et al
as 5:2022cv03199
Plaintiff:
Arjune Ahmed
Defendant:
D. Donley, (fnu) Deloiah, (fnu) Gabriel and others
Interested Party:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kissner v. WASHINGTON et al
as 2:2022cv11607
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee Kissner
Defendant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Brian Shipman, Greg Straub and others
Newton et al v. Hudson et al
as 5:2022cv03011
Plaintiff:
Andre Newton, Miguel Pizarro, Brian Pizarro and others
Defendant:
D. Hudson, Ol Aulepp, (fnu) Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Collins v. Clark et al
as 5:2021cv00063
Plaintiff:
Jamal E. Collins
Defendant:
FNU Clark, FNU Faulks, NP Elizabeth Martyn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2021cv00577
Defendant:
Wellpath Inc, FNU Smith, Rita Hood and others
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd v. TDCJ et al
as 1:2021cv00198
Plaintiff:
Randy Floyd, Jinx, Spinner and others
Defendant:
FNU Vasquez, TDCJ, V. Montoya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd v. TDCJ et al
as 6:2021cv00538
Plaintiff:
Randy Floyd, Jinx, Spinner and others
Defendant:
Sgt. FNU Clark, Officer FNU Vasquez, V. Montoya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Bishop et al
as 1:2021cv00017
Plaintiff:
Raylon Eugene Smith
Defendant:
FNU Blair, Ricky Bishop, FNU Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brock v. Coleman et al
as 5:2020cv00097
Defendant:
Warden Jeff Coleman, C.O. FNU Macguyver, Deputy Warden FNU Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Tommy Brock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
