Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-10630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-12369
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOONS, Facilities Director, ROBERT TOOLE, Field Operations Director and others
In re: Waseem Daker
as 22-11983
Petitioner:
In re: WASEEM DAKER
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Daker v. Ward et al
as 6:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Jack Koon, Steve Upon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Dye et al
as 5:2021cv00168
Plaintiff:
Albert Marquavious Lamar Anderson
Defendant:
Eric Dye, FNU LNU, Jeffrey Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Crowe et al
as 4:2021cv02870
Plaintiff:
Preston Jerome Taylor
Defendant:
Officer Crowe, FNU Cox and The State of Texas/Harris County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Crowe et al
as 1:2021cv00342
Plaintiff:
Preston Jerome Taylor
Defendant:
Officer Crowe, FNU Cox and The State of Texas/Harris County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeremy Pinson v. Estrada, et al
as 21-15531
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, USP Tucson, ANN ASH, ENGLAND, named as FNU England and others
Gant v. Elam et al
as 1:2021cv00117
Defendant:
Warden Chae Harris, Director Annette Smith-Chambers, John/Jane Doe 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Gant
Interested Party:
State of Ohio, Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Ward et al
as 6:2021cv00003
Defendant:
Ms. [FNU] Mosely, Dr. Sharon Lewis, Mr. [FNU] Whitfield and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
