Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Anderson v. Foothills Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
Foothills Correctional Institution, FNU Hudgins, FNU Motley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARGUETA ANARIBA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
Angel Argueta Anariba
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FNU Daley, FNU Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Freeman et al
as 5:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
FNU Freeman, FNU Honeycutt, Joshua Sigmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Duncan et al
as 5:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Jeffrey P. Duncan, FNU Freeman, Joshua Sigmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv10704
Plaintiff:
Mark Webster
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, MRF, FNU Montgomery and others
Yarclay v. Averitt et al
as 5:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
Jesse Manquan Yarclay
Defendant:
L Averitt, Dr L Averitt, Ms K Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Agee v. Church et al
as 1:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Ted Agee
Defendant:
FNU Church, FNU Shields, FNU Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dade v. Church et al
as 1:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Deeshun Dade
Defendant:
FNU Church, FNU Shields, FNU Reyburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Wellpath et al
as 4:2022cv10187
Plaintiff:
Matthew Harrison
Defendant:
Naphcare, Wellpath, Wayne, County of and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
