Cases 1 - 10 of 230
Wynne v. Lubbock Police Dept et al
as 5:2024cv00252
Defendant:
Lubbock Police Dept and Officer FNU Johnson
Plaintiff:
Direece Wynne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Walker et al
as 5:2024cv00250
Defendant:
FNU Hernandez, FNU Nathan, FNU Salazar and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton W. Mack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMERSON v. SIMMONS et al
as 1:2024cv00917
Defendant:
AD PORTER, R. RAMSEY, WA HOWELL and others
Plaintiff:
TERRY SIMERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simerson v. Simmons et al
as 3:2024cv00908
Defendant:
WA Howell, TD Smith, JK Parks and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Simerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dudley (ID 91359) v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv03177
Defendant:
(fnu) Johnson, (fnu) Agnew, Fred Cannon and others
Plaintiff:
James Richard Dudley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lacy v. Johnson et al
as 7:2024cv00109
Defendant:
Sgt. FNU Johnson, CO FNU Marrero and CO FNU Marrera
Plaintiff:
Quan M. Lacy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibson v. Thaxton et al
as 5:2024cv03100
Defendant:
(fnu) Bartels, (fnu) Nellee, (fnu) Jennings and others
Plaintiff:
David Allen Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. MTC Corp of Utah et al
as 3:2024cv01489
Defendant:
MTC Corp of Utah, Mr FNU Schmoker, Ms FNU Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Willard Joel Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donovan v. Stirling et al
as 8:2024cv03512
Defendant:
John Doe #2, Major FNU Gregg, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Donovan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00077
Defendant:
FNU Dunbar, C.O. FNU Snead, Capt. FNU Sv and others
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
