Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Whatley v. Stephens et al
as 1:2017cv00176
Plaintiff:
John Mark Whatley
Defendant:
Zena Stephens, FNU Kelly, FNU Malvo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Requena v. Roberts, et al
as 17-3040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN M. REQUENA
Defendant - Appellee:
RAY ROBERTS, SAM CLINE, BERRY LARSON and others
Perry v. Lydick et al
as 1:2016fp00469
Defendant:
FNU Carroll, FNU Dionne, FNU Edmark and others
Notice Only:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
James R. Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slaughter v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2016cv00144
Plaintiff:
Wade W. Slaughter
Defendant:
State of Utah, FNU Kelly and FNU Hansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penny v. Chalender et al
as 6:2014cv00782
Plaintiff:
Darrell Penny
Defendant:
FNU Chalender, FNU Brown, FNU Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dowden v. Kelly et al
as 1:2014cv00469
Plaintiff:
Aaron Dowden
Defendant:
FNU Kelly, Matt Cotton and Jefferson County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alston v. Swarbrick et al
as 5:2014cv00485
Plaintiff:
Omar T. Alston
Defendant:
FNU Swarbrick, FNU Trammel, FNU Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brame v. Woolf et al
as 5:2013cv00102
Plaintiff:
Robert Hal Brame
Defendant:
Ericka L. Woolf, FNU Tipton, FNU Crafton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jackson v. Munnerlyn et al
as 5:2012cv00591
Plaintiff:
Wanda Jackson
Defendant:
FNU Munnerlyn, FNU Rosario, FNU Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Smith et al
as 3:2012de00666
Plaintiff:
Wendell Knight
Defendant:
Lewis Smith, Robert G. Jones, Felix C. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
