Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Thomas v. Beauty Bell Enterprises, LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03844
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE THOMAS
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises, LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc., House of Cheatham LLC, L'Oreal USA, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rogers v. Reid et al
as 2:2023cv00636
Plaintiff:
Frankie Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
Gregory J Reid and Pamela Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
Frankie Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Blount County, Mark Moon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2021cv01065
Plaintiff:
Frankie Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Oneonta, City of, Charles Clifton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Frankie Thomas
as 20-3540
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANKIE THOMAS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Frankie Goulding
as 20-10399
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANKIE THOMAS GOULDING
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rogers v. Grandview Medical Center et al
as 2:2017cv02185
Plaintiff:
Frankie Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
Grandview Medical Center, Lefferage Robbins, Jr and Jackie Jay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas et al v. SSC Missouri City Operating Company, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv03361
Plaintiff:
Frankie Thomas , Anthony Thomas , Karlie Dennis and others
Defendant:
SSC Missouri City Operating Company, LLC, Regency IHS of Windsor Quail Valley, LLC and Regency Integrated Health Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Frasch
as 1:2017cv00932
Plaintiff:
Frankie Thomas
Defendant:
R. Frasch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. Baltazar
as 1:2017cv00121
Petitioner:
Frankie Thomas
Respondent:
J. Baltazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
