Cases 1 - 10 of 137
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cantin et al v. Ingham County et al
as 1:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cantin, Athel Curtis, Michael Freeman and others
Defendant:
Ingham, County of, Alan Fox and Eric Schertzing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Other Civil Rights
Berry v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2024cv10282
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Berry
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Aaron Lewber, Bryan Borowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kynwulf v. Corcoran et al
as 2:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Alfar Kynwulf and Darryl Blankenship
Defendant:
Maureen Corcoran, Matt Damschroder, Robert Bryne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Miller v. Freeman et al
as 2:2023cv11486
Plaintiff:
Anthony Miller
Defendant:
Eric Freeman and Burton, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McNeely v. Brooks et al
as 2:2023cv10220
Plaintiff:
Robbin McNeely
Defendant:
Anthony Brooks, Brian Warden, Dave Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
